[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?

    >> By stable I mean rate of change of codebase, patch volume per month,
    >> 2.6 is orders of magnitude less stable than 2.4 by that simple measure.
    >That is no measure of stability.

    Ack! Let's pick one:

    Although the exact numbers of patches per time for a specific
    software manufacturer - let's pick Microsoft as an example - is not known,
    it is usually low (two for this *month* afaics), compared to what hits lkml
    *each day*.

    Does that make their software more stable than Linux? I would have my
    doubts about that.

    Jan Engelhardt
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-15 23:55    [W:0.019 / U:43.500 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site