![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>> By stable I mean rate of change of codebase, patch volume per month, >> 2.6 is orders of magnitude less stable than 2.4 by that simple measure.>>That is no measure of stability.> Ack! Let's pick one: Although the exact numbers of patches per time for a specific software manufacturer - let's pick Microsoft as an example - is not known, it is usually low (two for this *month* afaics), compared to what hits lkml *each day*. Does that make their software more stable than Linux? I would have my doubts about that. Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-15 22:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||