[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] Expanding the size of "start" and "end" field in "struct resource"

    On Mar 15, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:

    > On Mar 15, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    >>> One of the possible solutions to this problem is that expand the
    >>> size
    >>> of "start" and "end" to "unsigned long long". But whole of the
    >>> PCI and
    >>> driver code has been written assuming start and end to be
    >>> unsigned long
    >>> and compiler starts throwing warnings.
    >> please use dma_addr_t then instead of unsigned long long
    >> this is the right size on all platforms afaik (could a ppc64 person
    >> verify this?> ;)
    > Actually we really just want "start" and "end" to be u64 on all
    > platforms. Linus was ok with this change but no one has gone
    > through and fixed everything that would be required for it.

    As my memory comes back to me on this. I also believe that Andrew
    asked me for size comparisons between a kernel using 32-bit start/end
    and 64-bit start/end on a 32-bit machine for a allyesconfig build. I
    don't believe I ever got around to doing this or reporting the
    numbers to him. It would be useful to have both code size
    differences and run time (if possible).

    - kumar
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-15 23:11    [W:0.042 / U:0.676 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site