Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 15 Mar 2006 08:01:28 -0800 | | From | Zachary Amsden <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching |
| |
Chris Wright wrote: > * Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > >> +static void fixup_translation(struct vmi_annotation *a) >> +{ >> + unsigned char *c, *start, *end; >> + int left; >> + >> + memcpy(a->nativeEIP, a->translationEIP, a->translation_size); >> + start = a->nativeEIP; >> + end = a->nativeEIP + a->translation_size; >> + >> + for (c = start; c < end;) { >> + switch(*c) { >> + case MNEM_CALL_NEAR: >> >> > Why these restrictions? How do you do int $0x82, for example? >
We don't. This is the minimal set of instructions that are emitted during the annotation. The instruction sequence is only sufficient to call out to the hypervisor ROM.
What we want to do next is to allow the hypervisor itself to do this code fixup - in effect, relinking in the local translations, which in many cases would then convert to int $0x82 for inline Xen calls.
Zach - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |