Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:24:40 +1100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: RFC: radix tree safety |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote: > corbet@lwn.net (Jonathan Corbet) wrote:
>>If we don't want the tests, fine, but it might make sense to fix the >>interface documentation, at least, to note that "tag" is not an >>arbitrary integer value. >> > > > Sure, we can live with the runtime cost of a documentation fix ;)
How about making the code self-documenting and more useful at the same time: put RADIX_TREE_TAGS in radix-tree.h, and call it RADIX_TREE_MAX_TAGS
-- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |