lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: RFC: radix tree safety
Andrew Morton wrote:
> corbet@lwn.net (Jonathan Corbet) wrote:

>>If we don't want the tests, fine, but it might make sense to fix the
>>interface documentation, at least, to note that "tag" is not an
>>arbitrary integer value.
>>
>
>
> Sure, we can live with the runtime cost of a documentation fix ;)

How about making the code self-documenting and more useful at the same
time: put RADIX_TREE_TAGS in radix-tree.h, and call it RADIX_TREE_MAX_TAGS

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-14 06:28    [W:0.797 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site