[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: does swsusp suck after resume for you? [was Re: Faster resuming of suspend technology.]

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:13:10PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Since my warning probably scared anyone from actually trying this patch I've
> given it a thorough working over on my own laptop, booting with mem=128M. The
> patch works fine and basically with the patch after resuming from disk I have
> 25MB more memory in use with pages prefetched from swap. This makes a
> noticeable difference to me. That's a pretty artificial workload, so if
> someone who actually has lousy wakeup after resume could test the patch it
> would be appreciated.

I did try it, but ran into weird unrelated compile failures multiple times
(sorry, no log).

Andreas Mohr
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-14 09:26    [W:0.098 / U:17.828 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site