[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: does swsusp suck after resume for you? [was Re: Faster resuming of suspend technology.]

    On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:13:10PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
    > Since my warning probably scared anyone from actually trying this patch I've
    > given it a thorough working over on my own laptop, booting with mem=128M. The
    > patch works fine and basically with the patch after resuming from disk I have
    > 25MB more memory in use with pages prefetched from swap. This makes a
    > noticeable difference to me. That's a pretty artificial workload, so if
    > someone who actually has lousy wakeup after resume could test the patch it
    > would be appreciated.

    I did try it, but ran into weird unrelated compile failures multiple times
    (sorry, no log).

    Andreas Mohr
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-14 09:26    [W:0.018 / U:4.344 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site