[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:21:32 +0000, Russell King <> wrote:

>On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:03:39PM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
>> By stable I mean rate of change of codebase, patch volume per month,
>> 2.6 is orders of magnitude less stable than 2.4 by that simple measure.
>That is no measure of stability.

You're welcome to your opinion.

>If, say, I merge a large patch in order to support ARM SMP and Linus
>takes that, let's say for the sake of argument that's a 10MB diff.
>It doesn't touch anything other than files which are solely built or
>used for the ARM architecture.

So what? You're not one of the people here beholden to pushing a
distro's agenda for mainstream x86 windoze wannabe desktops.

>So, by your very comment above, if all the updates to non-x86
>architectures were prevented from happening in mainline, you'd have
>a much more stable kernel.

Not at all, you choose whatever interpretation suits your world view.

>(Please do _not_ cc or reply directly to me in this thread - I'll
>read replies from the mailing list, thanks.)

Get real

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-15 01:52    [W:0.088 / U:41.572 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site