![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk> wrote: > > [...] > no. We have to run deadlock detection to avoid things like circular lock > dependencies causing an infinite schedule+wakeup 'storm' during priority > boosting. (like possible with your wakeup based method i think) No, all tasks would just settle on the highest priority and then the wakeups would stop. Esben - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-14 22:05 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||