Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:43:49 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? [was Re: Faster resuming of suspend technology.] |
| |
On Út 14-03-06 23:33:12, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 22:51, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Since my warning probably scared anyone from actually trying this patch > > > I've given it a thorough working over on my own laptop, booting with > > > mem=128M. The patch works fine and basically with the patch after > > > resuming from disk I have 25MB more memory in use with pages prefetched > > > from swap. This makes a noticeable difference to me. That's a pretty > > > artificial workload, so if someone who actually has lousy wakeup after > > > resume could test the patch it would be appreciated. > > > > Thanks for the patch... > > > > BTW.. if you want this maximally useful, it would be nice to have > > userspace interface for this. > > What sort of interface is suitable? There's a swap_prefetch tunable that is a > boolean but I could make that to be off=0, on=1, aggressive_prefetch=2 or > something.
That sounds nice. Pavel -- 116: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |