[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
Balbir Singh wrote:

>>You don't think it's a problem that 2.0000001s - 1.9999999s would return
>>garbage rather than 0.0000002?
>>'re right. I was thinking of invalid deltas (where end was
before start).

>The caller can use set_normalized_timespec() to fix that.
Lee's point is valid....we should be doing the set_normalized_timespec.

Will fix.

>Warm Regards,

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-14 05:30    [W:0.085 / U:0.368 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site