[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    Balbir Singh wrote:

    >>You don't think it's a problem that 2.0000001s - 1.9999999s would return
    >>garbage rather than 0.0000002?
    >>'re right. I was thinking of invalid deltas (where end was
    before start).

    >The caller can use set_normalized_timespec() to fix that.
    Lee's point is valid....we should be doing the set_normalized_timespec.

    Will fix.

    >Warm Regards,

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-14 05:30    [W:0.020 / U:12.916 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site