![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> I'm still a bit surprised, since in the rest of the kernel we are even > going from -O2 to -Os for getting better performance. > > Robert said he wanted to post some numbers showing that -O3 is > measurably better for you [1], but I haven't seen them. As you might have guessed, I kind of forgot about this (I was swamped with unrelated stuff.) I'll try get someone else here at PathScale to get these numbers. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: rjwalsh@pathscale.com PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-13 19:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||