Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:57:06 -0500 | From | "Dave Neuer" <> | Subject | Re: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers. |
| |
On 3/10/06, Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de> wrote: > > Strongly following this attitude they need to expand the current > MODULE_LICENSE insanity into userspace. The are lots of evil powers, > using non-GPL-ed software which calls the holy GPLed syscall handlers. > > Honestly, using double standards this way sucks. The last strike I > stubled over was putting class device registration methods into the GPL > "enforcing" macros, cloacked as mandatory interface changes. > > This is no longer funny, it is on the same level as drawing a line > around the toilet box and saying: you cannot use it any longer, go and > piss somewhere else even if you have to search two hours for a suitable > place.
I'm not sure how the analogy of a toilet fits either the linux kernel or the idea that I'm somehow obligated to work without compensation so some corporation can make a profit I get no share in.
Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |