Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:27:01 -0800 | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance bugs of doom |
| |
J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:26:09PM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote: >>A poor distribution as you already noticed[1]. > > How did you decide that?
I looked at it and jumped to the wrong conclusion :-)
When I actually simulated it I found that the distribution is in fact not much different from what I get from rand. So much for trying to pin the blame on the hash function. Next lets try to pin the blame on vmalloc. (Spoiler: it's not vmalloc's fault either.)
Regards,
Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |