lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance bugs of doom
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:26:09PM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>>A poor distribution as you already noticed[1].
>
> How did you decide that?

I looked at it and jumped to the wrong conclusion :-)

When I actually simulated it I found that the distribution is in fact
not much different from what I get from rand. So much for trying to
pin the blame on the hash function. Next lets try to pin the blame
on vmalloc. (Spoiler: it's not vmalloc's fault either.)

Regards,

Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-10 11:29    [W:0.296 / U:1.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site