lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 10 Mar 2006 11:28:39 +0300
FromKirill Korotaev <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Fix shrink_dcache_parent() against shrink_dcache_memory() race (3rd updated patch)]
Neil,

> On Thursday March 9, dev@openvz.org wrote:
> 
>>Andrew,
>>
>>Acked-By: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>
> 
> 
> I'm afraid that I'm not convinced.
> 
> 
>>>+static int wait_on_prunes(struct super_block *sb)
>>>+{
>>>+	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>>>+	int prunes_remaining = 0;
>>>+
>>>+#ifdef DCACHE_DEBUG
>>>+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: waiting for %d prunes\n", __FUNCTION__,
>>>+	       sb->s_prunes);
>>>+#endif
>>>+
>>>+	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
>>>+	for (;;) {
>>>+		prepare_to_wait(&sb->s_wait_prunes, &wait,
>>>+				TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>>>+		if (!sb->s_prunes)
>>>+			break;
>>>+		spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
>>>+		schedule();
>>>+		prunes_remaining = 1;
>>>+		spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
>>>+	}
>>>+	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
>>>+	finish_wait(&sb->s_wait_prunes, &wait);
>>>+	return prunes_remaining;
>>>+}
> 
> 
> I don't think that a return value from wait_on_prunes is meaningful.
> All it tells us is whether a prune_one_dentry finished before or after
> wait_on_prunes takes the spin_lock.  This isn't very useful
> information as it has no significance to upper levels.
> 
> So:
> 
> 
>>>+		do {
>>>+			shrink_dcache_parent(root);
>>>+		} while(wait_on_prunes(sb));
>>>+
> 
> 
> Suppose shrink_dcache_parent misses on dentry because the inode was being
> iput.  This iput completes immediately that
> shrink_dcache_parent completes.  It decrements ->s_prunes and when
> wait_on_prunes takes dcache_lock, ->s_prunes is zero so the loop
> terminates, and the remaining dentries - the parents of the dentry
> what was undergoing iput - don't get put.
you are right... :/
And this is actually why we originally inserted check for race
in select_parent() under dcache_lock... I just lost my memory :(

> I really think that we need to stop prune_one_dentry from being called
> on dentries for a filesystem that is being unmounted.  With that code
> currently in -git, that means passing a 'struct super_block *' into
> prune_dcache so that it ignores any filesystem with ->s_root==NULL
> unless that filesystem is the filesystem that was passed.
Can try...

Thanks,
Kirill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-10 08:26    [from the cache]
©2003-2008