lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 05:09:13PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> until the locks needs to be upgraded or downgraded. This provides a very
> large performance increase over always asking the DLM for a new lock.

Yes, it is basically the same problem as the buffer cache. Excessive
single-use patterns dirty the small cache or require a too big cache to be
usefull.

Maybe a user specific limit of percentage of hash (and locks) used? I mean
the untar test case is a bit synthetic, but think of concurrent read access
in a cluster of nntp servers (news article pool).

Gruss
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-11 03:00    [W:0.104 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site