[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance
    Zach Brown wrote:
    >>Pretty close race - vmalloc is slightly faster if anything.
    > I don't think that test tells us anything interesting about the relative
    > load on the TLB. What would be interesting is seeing the effect
    > vmalloc()ed hashes have on a concurrently running load that puts heavy
    > pressure on the TLB.

    Bzip2 isn't that kind of load?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-10 22:16    [W:0.020 / U:2.364 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site