lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance
    Zach Brown wrote:
    >>Pretty close race - vmalloc is slightly faster if anything.
    >
    > I don't think that test tells us anything interesting about the relative
    > load on the TLB. What would be interesting is seeing the effect
    > vmalloc()ed hashes have on a concurrently running load that puts heavy
    > pressure on the TLB.

    Bzip2 isn't that kind of load?

    Regards,

    Daniel
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-10 22:16    [W:0.026 / U:3.824 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site