[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance
Zach Brown wrote:
>>Pretty close race - vmalloc is slightly faster if anything.
> I don't think that test tells us anything interesting about the relative
> load on the TLB. What would be interesting is seeing the effect
> vmalloc()ed hashes have on a concurrently running load that puts heavy
> pressure on the TLB.

Bzip2 isn't that kind of load?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-10 22:16    [W:0.043 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site