lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance
Please don't drop the ocfs2-devel Cc:  I'm bouncing this there.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:14:08AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com> wrote:
> > Your hash sizes are still ridiculously large.
>
> How long are those entries in the buckets kept? I mean if I untar a tree the
> files are only locked while extracted, afterwards they are owner-less... (I
> must admint I dont understand ocfs2 very deeply, but maybe explaining why so
> many active locks need to be cached might help to find an optimized way.
>
> > By the way, an interesting thing happened when I recently switched disk
> > arrays - the fluctuations in untar times disappeared. The new array is much
> > nicer, while the old one was basically Just A Bunch Of Disks. Also, sync
> > times dropped dramatically.
>
> Writeback Cache?
>
> Gruss
> Bernd
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--

"Depend on the rabbit's foot if you will, but remember, it didn't
help the rabbit."
- R. E. Shay

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-10 08:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site