lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
From
Date
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 17:35 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> Two questions on this
> 1. It is not standard ethernet nor standard IP over Infiniband either, is it?

Correct.

> Is there some documentation on the wire protocol that you use?

No, but the encapsulation is very simple and easy to figure out from
reading the code.

> Is it pathscale specific?

It doesn't have to be.

> 2. Are there practical reasons why you get lower latency and higher
> bandwidth with this than with IPoIB?

The principal reason is that we haven't had time to pay attention to
IPoIB performance yet. The ipath_ether driver was developed before
IPoIB was usable for any real work.

> If there are optimizations, can they not be added to the standard, common
> IP over IB driver?

That's certainly our intention. It's simply a matter of finding the
time for it.

<b

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-10 17:05    [W:0.323 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site