![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 09:57 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > >>Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: >>Can you test with the latest mainline -git snapshot, or is it only >>the -rt tree that causes the warnings? > > > I found something strange although I don't know why it happens yet: > > Fedora Core 4 kernel (2.6.15 + patches) works fine. > Fedora Core 4 kernel + -rt21, [ahem... sorry], works fine. > Fedora Core 4 kernel + -rt21 + alsa kernel modules from 1.0.10 or > 1.0.11rc3, fails[*] > Plain vanilla 2.6.15 + -rt21, works fine > Plain vanilla 2.6.15 + -rt21 + alsa kernel modules from 1.0.10 or > 1.0.11rc3, fails[*] > > So, it looks like it is some weird interaction between kernel modules > that were not compiled as part of the kernel and the kernel itself. The > "updated" modules are installed in a separate location (not on top of > the built in kernel modules) and are found before the ones in the kernel > tree. > > I have been building this combination for a long long time with no > problems, I don't know what might have happened that changed things. > > Could be: > - configuration problems? No. It shouldn't do this even if there is a configuration problem. > - the alsa tree is somehow incompatible with the kernel alsa tree, is > that even possible? > Yes. Most likely this. It should be fixed before the new ALSA code is pushed upstream. It is probably not so much a matter of somebody breaking the ALSA code as that it hasn't been updated for the new kernel refcounting rules. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-10 05:10 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||