Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 1 Mar 2006 15:40:53 -0800 | | From | Andrew Morton <> | | Subject | Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree |
| |
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote: > > > Oh, and Paul, this all works just fine with no -mm, right? > > Do you mean - does 2.6.16-rc5 work for me? > > I haven't tried that yet. The lowest I went in Andrew's 2.6.16-rc5-rc1 > patch stack was one patch, which would be 2.6.16-rc5 plus > "linus.patch."
That's tip-of-linus-tree a day or so after -rc5.
> I will try a plain 2.6.16-rc5 as well, shortly.
I don't think there's much point in that - the sysfs-topology code went in on Feb 15.
If 2.6.16-rc5+linus.patch works and 2.6.16-rc5+linus.patch+gregkh-driver-allow-sysfs-attribute-files-to-be-pollable.patch crashes then we have a pretty good idea of where to look.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |