Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:50:13 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree |
| |
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:26:31PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:58:02PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: > > > Greg wrote: > > > > As reported this is expected, and can be ignored safely. It's just scsi > > > > being bad :) > > > > > > Yeah - so I eventually realized. > > > > > > > > [<a0000001001eac90>] sysfs_create_group+0x30/0x2a0 > > > > > sp=e00002343bd97d50 bsp=e00002343bd91120 > > > > > [<a000000100809190>] topology_cpu_callback+0x70/0xc0 > > > > > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910f0 > > > > > [<a000000100809260>] topology_sysfs_init+0x80/0x120 > > > > > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910d0 > > > > > > > > This points at the sysfs cpu patches that are in -mm, which are not in > > > > my tree... > > > > > > So ... what does that mean for who should be looking at this? > > > > Hm, looks like that stuff went into mainline already, sorry I thought it > > was still in -mm. > > > > Look at changeset 69dcc99199fe29b0a29471a3488d39d9d33b25fc for details. > > But Paul bisected it down to a particular not-merged patch, > gregkh-driver-allow-sysfs-attribute-files-to-be-pollable.patch, which I'll > admit doesn't look like it'll cause this.
Yeah, I realize that, it just really seems odd that this code dies, and I thought it was still in your tree at the time, sorry.
Oh, and Paul, this all works just fine with no -mm, right?
thanks,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |