Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:58:02 -0800 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree |
| |
Greg wrote: > As reported this is expected, and can be ignored safely. It's just scsi > being bad :)
Yeah - so I eventually realized.
> > [<a0000001001eac90>] sysfs_create_group+0x30/0x2a0 > > sp=e00002343bd97d50 bsp=e00002343bd91120 > > [<a000000100809190>] topology_cpu_callback+0x70/0xc0 > > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910f0 > > [<a000000100809260>] topology_sysfs_init+0x80/0x120 > > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910d0 > > This points at the sysfs cpu patches that are in -mm, which are not in > my tree...
So ... what does that mean for who should be looking at this?
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |