lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
Greg wrote:
> As reported this is expected, and can be ignored safely. It's just scsi
> being bad :)

Yeah - so I eventually realized.

> > [<a0000001001eac90>] sysfs_create_group+0x30/0x2a0
> > sp=e00002343bd97d50 bsp=e00002343bd91120
> > [<a000000100809190>] topology_cpu_callback+0x70/0xc0
> > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910f0
> > [<a000000100809260>] topology_sysfs_init+0x80/0x120
> > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910d0
>
> This points at the sysfs cpu patches that are in -mm, which are not in
> my tree...

So ... what does that mean for who should be looking at this?

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-01 22:00    [W:0.085 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site