Messages in this thread | | | From | Joerg Schilling <> | Date | Thu, 09 Feb 2006 11:27:30 +0100 | Subject | Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) |
| |
DervishD <lkml@dervishd.net> wrote:
> other half doesn't have it probably has a bad user interface. You > know that if a program uses a naming convention different from ALL > the rest of programs is because the program has a problem. You know > that if the only UNIX program out there that doesn't use /dev entries > to talk to devices is cdrecord, the problem *probably* is in > cdrecord, and not in UNIX...
So why do you like to introduce a different naming scheme?
Look into the real world and you will find that most SCSI related programs use a namischscheme that is either identical to what cdrecord does or a very similar one.
Jörg
-- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |