Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:33:17 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) |
| |
On Po 06-02-06 22:17:04, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 22:01 -0500, Jim Crilly wrote: > > With uswsusp it'll be more flexible in that you'll be able to use any > > userland process or library to transform the image before storing it, but > > the suspend and resume processes are going to be a lot more complicated. > > For instance, how are you going to tell the kernel that you need the > > uswsusp UI binary, /bin/gzip and /usr/bin/gpg to run after the rest of > > userland has been frozen? > > Unless someone at least gives a rough estimate of 1) what % of users > can't suspend their laptops now and 2) of these, what % are helped by > suspend2, this thread is just handwaving...
and 3) for what % of users, suspend2 will actually break it (bugs happen).
Anyway it seems to be something like 1) 90% 2) 1% 3) .5%
Pavel -- Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |