lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
On 02/08/06 12:02:45AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> Ugh?
>
> Lee is a programmer. He wants faster swsusp, and improving uswsusp is
> currently best way to get that. It may be alpha/beta quality, but
> someone has to start testing, and Lee should be good for that (played
> with realtime kernels etc...). Actually it is in good enough state
> that I'd like non-programmers to test it, too.
>
> And yes, I'm a maintainer, and that means I have to reject bad
> patches from time to time, too.
> Pavel

Best is a subjective term, I would say the 'best' way to get a swsusp
implementation that can save all of his caches and still suspend/resume
faster would be to just apply the Suspend2 patches and get on with
whatever he'd rather be doing since the work's already been done.

Jim.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-08 00:53    [W:2.303 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site