Messages in this thread | | | From | "Jim Crilly" <> | Date | Tue, 7 Feb 2006 18:50:06 -0500 | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) |
| |
On 02/08/06 12:02:45AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > Ugh? > > Lee is a programmer. He wants faster swsusp, and improving uswsusp is > currently best way to get that. It may be alpha/beta quality, but > someone has to start testing, and Lee should be good for that (played > with realtime kernels etc...). Actually it is in good enough state > that I'd like non-programmers to test it, too. > > And yes, I'm a maintainer, and that means I have to reject bad > patches from time to time, too. > Pavel
Best is a subjective term, I would say the 'best' way to get a swsusp implementation that can save all of his caches and still suspend/resume faster would be to just apply the Suspend2 patches and get on with whatever he'd rather be doing since the work's already been done.
Jim. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |