Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Feb 2006 00:36:53 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) |
| |
Hi!
> > Please do not patch kernel for that. > > > > Proper solution is probably creating s2disk program/script, and teach > > kpowersave/klaptop/etc. to just use it. Then s2disk can detect best > > method to use ... and then just do it. You already have suitable > > script, but I'm not sure what its name is. > > It occured to me as soon as I sent the last email (don't you hate that!) > that I'd forgotten the original impetus: backwards compatibility. If all > of the methods of suspending can be started with > > "echo disk > /sys/power/state" > > , your backwards compatability issue that you expressed concern about > earlier in this discussion is addressed. So, I'm not sure that dropping the > idea is the right thing to do.
Yes, it probably is. echo > /sys/*/state needs to work for a while, but we should really move everyone into running single command. Your hibernate script probably good start. (I'd call it hibernate, not hibernate.sh, so it does not *have* to be implemented in shell). Pavel -- Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |