Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:17:04 -0500 |
| |
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 22:01 -0500, Jim Crilly wrote: > With uswsusp it'll be more flexible in that you'll be able to use any > userland process or library to transform the image before storing it, but > the suspend and resume processes are going to be a lot more complicated. > For instance, how are you going to tell the kernel that you need the > uswsusp UI binary, /bin/gzip and /usr/bin/gpg to run after the rest of > userland has been frozen?
Unless someone at least gives a rough estimate of 1) what % of users can't suspend their laptops now and 2) of these, what % are helped by suspend2, this thread is just handwaving...
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |