![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@osdl.org] >MIT license is unusual. There's one other file in the kernel which uses it >and that's down in MTD where nobody dares look. Well, I look at the MTD code a lot... That's why I used it (i.e. that was the existence proof I found that it's fine ;-) >I don't know whether MIT is GPL-compatible-for-kernel-purposes or not. Help. Nothing it that license precludes the code being redistributed under the GPL. (It is a verbatim copy of http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php). >MODULE_LICENSE("Dual MIT/GPL"); Is fine with me, indeed, given the license text, I don't believe I retain any rights to *prevent* such a change (and it was certainly not my intent to prevent redistribution under a more restrictive license). Using 'MIT' or substituting some more specific tag must be fine for the same reason (it's a name of a license, not a license itself). John Bowler <jbowler@acm.org> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-02-06 08:04 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||