lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 6 Feb 2006 22:57:25 +1100
FromDavid Chinner <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Prevent large file writeback starvation
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 10:36:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> >
> > If so, why would that happen?  Take a look at wb_kupdate().  It's supposed
> >  to work *continuously* on the inodes until writeback_inodes() failed to
> >  write back enough pages.  It takes this as an indication that there's no
> >  more work to do at this time.
> > 
> >  It'd be interesting to take a look at what's happening in wb_kupdate().
> 
> Took a quick look at xfs_convert_page().  I don't immediately see a cause
> in there, but
> 
> 		if (count) {
> 			struct backing_dev_info *bdi;
> 
> 			bdi = inode->i_mapping->backing_dev_info;
> 			if (bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
> 				wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
> 				done = 1;
> 			} else if (--wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
> 				done = 1;
> 			}
> 		}
> 		xfs_start_page_writeback(page, wbc, !page_dirty, count);
> 
> shouldn't we be decrementing wbc->nr_to_write even if the queue is congested?

Yes, you are right. I'll fix it tomorrow.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
R&D Software Enginner
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-06 13:00    [from the cache]
©2003-2008