![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andrew wrote:
> If so then there's probably not much point in optimising it - but one needs
> to look at the numbers.
Ok - I'll play around with it.
> Please also have a think about __cache_alloc() ..
I'll give it shot - no telling if I'll hit anything yet.
> but one needs to look at the numbers.
Definitely.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-02-05 07:31 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||