![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 10:41 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Ah, sorry about that, I forgot to verify the NUMA case. The problem is > that to kmalloc_node() is calling cache_alloc() now which is forced > inline. I am wondering, would it be ok to make __cache_alloc() > non-inline for NUMA? The relevant numbers are: [snip] Btw, we can also change kmalloc_node() to use kmem_cache_alloc_node() again but for that, we have a minor correctness issue, namely, the __builtin_return_address(0) won't work for kmalloc_node(). Hmm. Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-02-05 10:20 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||