lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 4 Feb 2006 10:01:12 +0100
FromPavel Machek <>
SubjectRe: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
On So 04-02-06 11:20:54, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi Pavel.
> 
> On Friday 03 February 2006 21:44, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > [Pavel is willing to take patches, as his cooperation with Rafael
> > shows, but is scared by both big patches and series of 10 small
> > patches he does not understand. He likes patches removing code.]
> 
> Assuming you're refering to the patches that started this thread, what don't 
> you understand? I'm more than happy to explain.

For "suspend2: modules support", it is pretty clear that I do not need
or want that complexity. But for "refrigerator improvements", I did
not understand which parts are neccessary because of suspend2
vs. swsusp differences, and if there is simpler way towards the same
goal. (And thanks for a stress hint...)
								Pavel

-- 
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-04 09:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2008