Messages in this thread |  | | | From | Joerg Schilling <> | | Date | Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:57:35 +0100 | | Subject | Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) |
| |
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl> wrote:
> "Jim Crilly" <jim@why.dont.jablowme.net> writes: > > > A bug in HAL is not a bug in Linux. If the HAL people need to make some > > changes to their daemon to make it play nice with cdrecord and the like > > that's fine, but telling people here makes no sense. > > Does that mean that hald doesn't actually play nice with cdrecord?
I cannot speak from own experiences on Linux here, but this is what I see:
- If you check Linux distributions for related bug reports, you find many problems with hald.
- If you try to find similar bug reports for Solaris vold, there is no report I am aware of.
Trying to rate this would make me asume that hald could be changed to play better with cdrecord.
Jörg
-- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |