[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Development tree, PLEASE?
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:31:58PM -0600, Christopher Friesen wrote:
> Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >Given the past
> >experience of 2.4 and the time I can spend on kernel work, I would
> >not even consider basing anything on 2.6 before something like 2.6.20-25,
> >when it will hopefully settle down a bit.
> Unfortunately there are many times when this simply isn't an option.
> I'm currently working on boards that simply are not supported on 2.4.
> Thus either we need to track 2.6, or else we need to pay someone to do
> it for us and hope they do a good job.
> Of course what actually happens is that you pick a kernel version
> (hopefully you pick well) and then backport fixes.

This choice is valid when you have time or money for this. What I said
is people who have no skills, no time and no money should obviously
not consider 2.6 right now for a new project, it's moving too fast, and
spending 1 hour a week on it is not enough.

> Upgrading
> continuously simply isn't an option, as we have multiple vendors
> providing BSPs, drivers, patches, etc. and they're all supported only
> for that specific kernel version. We can really only upversion the
> kernel once a year or so, if that often.


> Chris


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-03 06:11    [W:0.097 / U:7.876 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site