Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders | Date | Fri, 3 Feb 2006 08:31:43 -0500 | From | Andrew James Wade <> |
| |
On Friday 03 February 2006 00:35, David Schwartz wrote: > I have no idea what you mean by the "GPL's license". If it's contained in > the GPL, it's part of the GPL. The GPL is all of a piece.
"Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed."
Those two lines look like a copyright license for the GPL. It makes sense for the GPL to be licensed under the GPL, but it's less than obvious to me that that is actually the case.
Andrew Wade - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |