![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Roland Dreier wrote: > Jes> Could you explain why the current mmiowb() API won't suffice > Jes> for this? It seems that this is basically trying to achieve > Jes> the same thing. > > I don't believe mmiowb() is at all the same thing. mmiowb() is all > about ordering writes between _different_ CPUs without incurring the > cost of flushing posted writes by issuing a read on the bus. Not quite correct as far as I understand it. mmiowb() is supposed to guarantee that writes to MMIO space have completed before continuing. That of course covers the multi-CPU case, but it should also cover the write-combining case. > wc_wmb() > would just act like a true wmb(), even when using write-combining > regions on x86 -- in other words, there would be no cross-CPU synchronization. I wary of adding yet another variation unless there is a clear distinction between them that is easy to understandn for driver authors. Cheers, Jes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-02-28 17:10 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||