lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH -mm 2/2] mm: make shrink_all_memory try harder
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> Make shrink_all_memory() repeat the attempts to free more memory if there
> seems to be no pages to free.
>

This description doesn't describe what the problem is, not how the patch
fixes it. So I'm kinda left guessing.

> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc4-mm2.orig/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc4-mm2/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> #include <linux/cpuset.h>
> #include <linux/notifier.h>
> #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> #include <asm/div64.h>
> @@ -1793,17 +1794,24 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned
> struct reclaim_state reclaim_state = {
> .reclaimed_slab = 0,
> };
> + int retry = 2;
>
> current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
> - for_each_pgdat(pgdat) {
> - unsigned long freed;
> + do {
> + for_each_pgdat(pgdat) {
> + unsigned long freed;
>
> - freed = balance_pgdat(pgdat, nr_to_free, 0);
> - ret += freed;
> - nr_to_free -= freed;
> - if (nr_to_free <= 0)
> + freed = balance_pgdat(pgdat, nr_to_free, 0);
> + ret += freed;
> + nr_to_free -= freed;
> + if (nr_to_free <= 0)
> + break;
> + }
> + if (ret > 0)
> break;
> - }
> + if (retry)
> + msleep_interruptible(100);

TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE sleeps won't do anything if someone has sent this
process a signal. They should be used with caution.


Something like the below, I guess. But it's hard to fix something when you
don't know what you're fixing.

swsusp should call drop_pagecache() and then drop_slab() before trying to
use shrink_all_memory(), btw.


diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~mm-make-shrink_all_memory-try-harder mm/vmscan.c
--- devel/mm/vmscan.c~mm-make-shrink_all_memory-try-harder 2006-02-27 19:17:29.000000000 -0800
+++ devel-akpm/mm/vmscan.c 2006-02-27 19:21:08.000000000 -0800
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
#include <linux/cpuset.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>

#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
#include <asm/div64.h>
@@ -1783,11 +1784,13 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned
pg_data_t *pgdat;
unsigned long nr_to_free = nr_pages;
unsigned long ret = 0;
+ unsigned retry = 2;
struct reclaim_state reclaim_state = {
.reclaimed_slab = 0,
};

current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
+repeat:
for_each_pgdat(pgdat) {
unsigned long freed;

@@ -1797,6 +1800,10 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned
if ((long)nr_to_free <= 0)
break;
}
+ if (retry-- && ret < nr_pages) {
+ blk_congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/5);
+ goto repeat;
+ }
current->reclaim_state = NULL;
return ret;
}
_
But then, the above could be implemented by the caller, so I don't know
what's going on..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-28 04:29    [W:0.097 / U:0.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site