[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: New reliability technique
Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 2/26/06, Victor Porton <> wrote:
>>Isn't it better to double check (especially after such risky things as
>>e.g. software suspend)?
>>We need to check not only for damaged hardware, but also for
>>kernel/modules bugs. For this ECC and cache reliability is useless.
> What kernel bugs do you want to catch with double-checking free
> memory? For use-after-free, we already have slab poisoning.

And for !slab, we unmap kernel virtual addresses with page debugging,
which seems like a better solution.

SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-26 13:33    [W:0.034 / U:1.772 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site