[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: New reliability technique
    Pekka Enberg wrote:
    > On 2/26/06, Victor Porton <> wrote:
    >>Isn't it better to double check (especially after such risky things as
    >>e.g. software suspend)?
    >>We need to check not only for damaged hardware, but also for
    >>kernel/modules bugs. For this ECC and cache reliability is useless.
    > What kernel bugs do you want to catch with double-checking free
    > memory? For use-after-free, we already have slab poisoning.

    And for !slab, we unmap kernel virtual addresses with page debugging,
    which seems like a better solution.

    SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
    Send instant messages to your online friends

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-26 13:33    [W:0.020 / U:19.948 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site