[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: New reliability technique
On 2/26/06, Victor Porton <> wrote:
> Isn't it better to double check (especially after such risky things as
> e.g. software suspend)?
> We need to check not only for damaged hardware, but also for
> kernel/modules bugs. For this ECC and cache reliability is useless.

What kernel bugs do you want to catch with double-checking free
memory? For use-after-free, we already have slab poisoning.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-26 13:27    [W:0.059 / U:2.688 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site