lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: New reliability technique
    On 2/26/06, Victor Porton <porton@ex-code.com> wrote:
    > Isn't it better to double check (especially after such risky things as
    > e.g. software suspend)?
    >
    > We need to check not only for damaged hardware, but also for
    > kernel/modules bugs. For this ECC and cache reliability is useless.

    What kernel bugs do you want to catch with double-checking free
    memory? For use-after-free, we already have slab poisoning.

    Pekka
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-26 13:27    [W:0.023 / U:31.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site