lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings
On 2/26/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 22:56 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Yeah so gcc is not perfect, but that still doesn't change that the
> > intention of the warning and the use of the word "might" is as I said
> > above.
>
> Not a very compelling case for changing the kernel rather than getting
> GCC fixed.
>

I think we are misunderstanding eachother. Or rather, I seem to have
misread what Nix wrote.

I saw "(i.e., there's a reason that warning uses the word *might*.)"
and mistakenly read it as a question - "is there a reason that warning
uses the word *might*?".
I then proceeded to answer that question.
When I read your latest mail I then couldn't make sense of things any
longer and went back and read the previous mails again and realized my
mistake.

My bad, sorry.


--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-26 23:15    [W:0.065 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site