Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:05:19 +0100 | From | Johannes Stezenbach <> | Subject | Re: Status of X86_P4_CLOCKMOD? |
| |
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Saturday 25 February 2006 02:57, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > P4 clockmod certainly sucks compared to Speedstep, > > but IMHO it is still potentially useful for the average > > desktop PC user (at least those many who let their PCs > > run 24/7, but 90% idle and unused). > > I don't think so no. The latencies make it unusable.
I tried to explain that I think one can use it in a way so the latencies are not a big issue. One must just accept that it needs different policy than Speedstep etc.
Johannes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |