lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromAndreas Schwab <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4
DateSat, 25 Feb 2006 11:05:18 +0100
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> writes:

> Hm, how about "inline"? GCC also just keeps quiet when a function (or 
> prototype) is written as:
>
> inline static int foo(int bar);

"iniline" is not a storage-class specifier, thus it should be handled like
"const" etc.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-25 11:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2008