lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: NFS Still broken in 2.6.x?
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 15:35 -0500, Bryan Fink wrote:
> > Hi All. I'm running into a bit of trouble with NFS on 2.6. I see that
> > at least Trond thought, mid-January, that "The readahead algorithm has
> > been broken in 2.6.x for at least the past 6 months." (
> > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0601.2/0559.html) Anyone
> > know if that has been fixed?
>
> No it hasn't been fixed. ...and no, this is not a problem that only
> affects NFS: it just happens to give a more noticeable performance
> impact due to the larger latency of NFS over a 100Mbps link.

iirc, last time we went round this loop Ram and I were unable to reproduce it.

Does anyone have a testcase?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-24 13:17    [W:0.051 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site