Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Feb 2006 04:14:35 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: NFS Still broken in 2.6.x? |
| |
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 15:35 -0500, Bryan Fink wrote: > > Hi All. I'm running into a bit of trouble with NFS on 2.6. I see that > > at least Trond thought, mid-January, that "The readahead algorithm has > > been broken in 2.6.x for at least the past 6 months." ( > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0601.2/0559.html) Anyone > > know if that has been fixed? > > No it hasn't been fixed. ...and no, this is not a problem that only > affects NFS: it just happens to give a more noticeable performance > impact due to the larger latency of NFS over a 100Mbps link.
iirc, last time we went round this loop Ram and I were unable to reproduce it.
Does anyone have a testcase? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |