[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)

> > > 2) shrink_all_memory() should be fixed. It should not really return if
> > > there are more pages freeable.
> >
> > Well, that would be a long-run solution. However, until it's fixed we can
> > use a workaround IMHO. ;-)
> Isn't trying to free as much memory as you can the wrong solution anyway? I
> mean, that only means that the poor system has more pages to fault back in at
> resume time, before the user can even begin to think about doing anything
> useful. You might be able to say "Every machine that suspend2 works on,
> swsusp works on", but the later will be a pretty sad definition of works!

We are trying to catch a bug here. suspend2 or not, it is a bug and it
should be fixed (or at least understood).

[Also please try to tone down your messages. Your suspend2 may be more
user-friendly, you do not want to start that flamewar again, do you?
Saying "don't bother fixing that" is not nice thing to do.]
Web maintainer for ( wanted...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-25 00:56    [W:0.360 / U:5.748 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site