[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Status of X86_P4_CLOCKMOD?
    On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 12:55:30AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > On Friday 24 February 2006 00:33, Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > > EMBEDDED is the wrong option, since the semantics of embedded is "show
    > > more options to allow additional space savings". It is not and should
    > > not be abused as an option to hide random options from users.
    > I disagree. And I originally added most EMBEDDED users to the kernel.
    > The purpose I added it for was to hide options that only useful
    > for a very limited userbase but cause big or subtle trouble when set
    > wrong. P4_CLOCKMOD clearly qualifies.

    This matches neither the description of the EMBEDDED option nor all
    other usages in the kernel I have seen until now.

    We need an additional option for such cases, but overloading EMBEDDED
    with more than one meaning is definitely not a good idea.

    > -Andi



    "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
    of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
    "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
    Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-24 03:42    [W:0.031 / U:0.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site