[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]
    On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 18:05 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
    > Pavel, if you mean that the userspace code will not be reviewed to
    > standards the kernel code is, kill uswsusp _NOW_ before it does too
    > much damage. Unreliable suspend eats filesystems for breakfast. The
    > other userspace components of the kernels services are either optional
    > (udev) or not that important (alsa).

    Why is sound less important than suspending, or networking, or any other
    subsystem? This is an insult to everyone who worked long and hard to
    get decent sound support on Linux.

    This attitude is why many distro's sound support is godawful. Sometimes
    I suspect they are testing on machines without speakers connected.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-21 23:05    [W:0.062 / U:44.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site