[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: softlockup interaction with slow consoles
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 21:01, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <>
> Date: 21 Feb 2006 14:49:49 +0100
> > Still you could probably see problems with very slow consoles even
> > after bootup, couldn't you?
> Yes, others have mentioned this too, good point.
> Depending upon what we're really trying to achieve with the
> softlockup stuff, we can perhaps look into increasing the
> timeout or making it configurable. We could even do this
> dynamically, so when we register a serial console running
> at some low baud rate, we scale up the softlockup timeout
> or something like that.

The classic way is to just use touch_nmi_watchdog() somewhere
in the loop that does work. That touches the softwatchdog too
these days.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-21 21:08    [W:0.088 / U:0.456 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site