[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: softlockup interaction with slow consoles
    On Tuesday 21 February 2006 21:01, David S. Miller wrote:
    > From: Andi Kleen <>
    > Date: 21 Feb 2006 14:49:49 +0100
    > > Still you could probably see problems with very slow consoles even
    > > after bootup, couldn't you?
    > Yes, others have mentioned this too, good point.
    > Depending upon what we're really trying to achieve with the
    > softlockup stuff, we can perhaps look into increasing the
    > timeout or making it configurable. We could even do this
    > dynamically, so when we register a serial console running
    > at some low baud rate, we scale up the softlockup timeout
    > or something like that.

    The classic way is to just use touch_nmi_watchdog() somewhere
    in the loop that does work. That touches the softwatchdog too
    these days.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-21 21:08    [W:0.018 / U:85.100 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site