Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:36:16 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) |
| |
On Po 20-02-06 10:43:00, Matthias Hensler wrote: > Hi. > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:29:52PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Maybe very little of substance is being done in userspace, but all the > > uglyness can stay there. I no longer need LZF in kernel, special > > netlink API for progress bar (progress bar naturally lives in > > userland), no plugin infrastructure needed, etc. > > Linux has a whole crypto API in the kernel, so why is it a problem to > have LZF there too?
Because it is not needed there?
> About the progress bar: this is already implemented in userspace, the > kernel just forwards the progress via netlink to it. Not necessarily > ugly I think.
Look at the code. Pavel
-- Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |