Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:02:38 -0500 |
| |
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 10:39 +0100, Matthias Hensler wrote: > > It is slightly slower, > > Sorry, but that is just unacceptable.
Um... suspend2 puts extra tests into really hot paths like fork(), which is equally unacceptable to many people.
Why can't people understand that arguing "it works" without any consideration of possible performance tradeoffs is not a good enough argument for merging?
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |