[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 10:39 +0100, Matthias Hensler wrote:
> > It is slightly slower,
> Sorry, but that is just unacceptable.

Um... suspend2 puts extra tests into really hot paths like fork(), which
is equally unacceptable to many people.

Why can't people understand that arguing "it works" without any
consideration of possible performance tradeoffs is not a good enough
argument for merging?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-20 11:05    [W:0.307 / U:18.436 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site