lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    From
    Date
    On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 10:39 +0100, Matthias Hensler wrote:
    > > It is slightly slower,
    >
    > Sorry, but that is just unacceptable.

    Um... suspend2 puts extra tests into really hot paths like fork(), which
    is equally unacceptable to many people.

    Why can't people understand that arguing "it works" without any
    consideration of possible performance tradeoffs is not a good enough
    argument for merging?

    Lee

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-20 11:05    [W:0.021 / U:0.248 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site