lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
From
Date
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 10:39 +0100, Matthias Hensler wrote:
> > It is slightly slower,
>
> Sorry, but that is just unacceptable.

Um... suspend2 puts extra tests into really hot paths like fork(), which
is equally unacceptable to many people.

Why can't people understand that arguing "it works" without any
consideration of possible performance tradeoffs is not a good enough
argument for merging?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-20 11:05    [W:0.553 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans