lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] Cache align futex hash buckets
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 03:34:19PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -100,9 +100,10 @@ struct futex_q {
> > > struct futex_hash_bucket {
> > > spinlock_t lock;
> > > struct list_head chain;
> > > -};
> > > +} ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
> > >
> > > -static struct futex_hash_bucket futex_queues[1<<FUTEX_HASHBITS];
> > > +static struct futex_hash_bucket futex_queues[1<<FUTEX_HASHBITS]
> > > + __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> > >
> >
> > How much memory does that thing end up consuming?
>
> I think a megabyte?

On most machines it would be 256 * 128 = 32k. or 16k on arches with 64B
cachelines. This looked like a simpler solution for spinlocks falling on
the same cacheline. So is 16/32k unreasonable?

Thanks,
Kiran
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-21 01:11    [W:0.054 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site