Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:01:35 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) |
| |
Hi!
> > > But then again, this was about work/not work, and there are still > > > problems, so there is still efford needed. In this situation it is > > > not good to just start over, but take the things that are already > > > there and work with it. > > > > I seen Nigel's recent patch. Yes, it is easier to just start over. > > (8000 unneccessary lines... that's 3 times size of swsusp with uswsusp > > included!) > > Correct me if I am wrong, but I see your comments are about Suspend 2.2, > while a lot of this was already be fixed in 2.2.0.1. > > And Nigel has taken your points and preparing a new patch. So let see > when it is ready.
Well... I trust that all the typos and =0 and // comments are going to be fixed, but I somehow doubt he'll switch to mainline code and drop his bitmaps or drop plugin architecture. If 2.2.0.2 is 8000 lines smaller... I'd be pleasently surprised. Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |